JBL Technical Note - Vol.1, No.17 电路原理图.pdf
《JBL Technical Note - Vol.1, No.17 电路原理图.pdf》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《JBL Technical Note - Vol.1, No.17 电路原理图.pdf(45页珍藏版)》请在收音机爱好者资料库上搜索。
1、Technical Notes Vol. 1, No. 17 Measurement and Interpretation of Loudspeaker Polar Data: A Comparison of JBL Constant Coverage Bi-Radial Horns and EV HP Large Format Horns Introductions Recent polar measurements of JBL and EV large for- mat horns indicate that current data sheets from both manufactu
2、rers do not present accurate descriptions of the horns. EVs data sheets for their HP Series horns indi- cate 6 dB beamwidth control extending smoothly to 20 kHz in both horizontal and vertical planes. By compari- son, the data sheets for the JBL large Bi-Radial horns indicate significant narrowing o
3、f beamwidth above 12.5 kHz in both planes. We reasoned that both JBL and EV horns should have similar horizontal dispersion, inasmuch as both devices have similar diffraction slot dimensions. Regarding vertical beamwidth control at high frequen- cies, the presence of horizontal vanes in the throat o
4、f the EV horns may cause significant performance differences. We will comment further on this point later. We were thus prompted to make new measurements on both families of large horns, and the results may be summarized as follows: 1. High frequency beaming above 10 kHz is a problem in all horns. T
5、he diffraction slot in both 90 x 40 horns is not narrow enough to maintain full horizontal beamwidth at the highest frequencies. (Compare Figures 6 and 9.) 2. The JBL 2365A does, however, maintain full horizontal beamwidth at the highest frequencies, while the EV HP6040 does not. (Compare Figures 7
6、and 10.) 3. Clearly the worst performer in these tests was the EV HP4020 horn. There is no differentiation in horizontal and vertical pattern control below 2 kHz. By comparison, the JBL 2366A maintains clear differentiation down to 600 Hz. (Compare Figures 8 and 11.) 4. Overall, there appear to be n
7、o benefits in high fre- quency vertical pattern control due to the much touted vanes in the EV horns. Test Conditions: JBL engaged Summit Laboratories of Warner Springs, CA, to make independent comparative polar measurements under absolutely identical conditions, which were set as follows: 1. Outdoo
8、r ground plane conditions as shown in Figure 1. The measurement distance was 6 meters (20 feet) for the 90 x 40 and 60 x 40 horns and 10 meters (33 feet) for the 40 x 20 horns. The turntable was tilted so that the plane of rotation was exactly in line with the microphone. For horizontal data, rotati
9、on was about the diffraction slot; for vertical data, rotation was about the driver. The JBL 2450J driver was used for all tests. 2. The test signal was high-pass filtered pink noise with one-third octave filtering in the microphone return path. Pen writing speeds varied from 125 to 500 mm/s, consis
10、tent with frequency of measurement and horn rota- tion speed. 3. The test site was free of reflections and other disturbances. Tests were carried out during times of the day when wind velocity and thermal gradients were mini- mal. The symmetry of the plots indicates that reflections from nearby surf
11、aces were virtually nonexistent. 4. High electrical and acoustical signal-to-noise ratios were maintained. At high frequencies, front-to-back level ratios were often in excess of 40 dB. Summit Laboratories measurements have subse- quently been verified by free-field measurements made at the Technica
12、l University of Denmark. Data Presentation: The polar data is presented unretouched and reduced in diameter to 33%, which is about the minimum size which allows the user to identify clearly the one dB divisions. Horizontal and vertical sets are given, begin- ning at 500 Hz and proceeding upward on I
13、SO one-third octave frequencies to 20 kHz. Data is presented in the following order: Appendix I: JBL 2360A Appendix ll:EVHP9040 Appendix III: JBL 2365A Appendix IV: EV HP6040 Appendix V: JBL 2366A Appendix VI: EV HP4020 Derived Data Presentation: As can be seen, polar data takes up a good deal of sp
14、ace, and most manufacturers routinely show derived data in the form of directivity index, directivity factor, - 6 1 dB beamwldth plots in horizontal and vertical planes, and selected off-axis frequency response. The general definition of beamwidth seems clear enough, and if the device under measurem
15、ent has max- imum sensitivity along its principal axis, decreasing monotonically away from that axis, as shown in Figure 2, then there is no question what the beamwidth is. The matter becomes more complicated when the polar response is as shown in Figure 3. Here, the response is not maximum along th
16、e principal axis, but rises 3 dB at an angle about 5 degrees off-axis. The question becomes: should the beamwidth be established as the included angle at which the response is - 3 dB (a total envelope of 6 dB), or should it be the - 6 dB included angle relative to the on-axis value? JBL has historic
17、ally taken the former approach, defining beamwidth based on a total level variation of no more than 6 dB. Thus a beamwidth of 34 degrees, as indicated in Figure 3, is what JBL would consider accurate. Others may take the approach of striking off the included angle at which response is - 6 relative t
18、o the on-axis value, as we have shown in Figure 4. Here, the same polar data as used in Figure 3 yields a beamwidth of 47 degrees. The difference is quite significant. Thus, published beamwidth data is subject to inter- pretation on the part of the manufacturer, and only a study of the original data
19、 will clarify the matter for the user. JBL proposes the following: Beamwidth is defined as the largest included angle in the direction of the principal axis over which the axial response of a device does not vary by more than 6 dB. Readings are to be made in both horizontal and vertical planes, and
20、all measurements should be made suffi- ciently far from the device so that inverse square level errors due to device rotation are minimal. All measure- ment conditions should be stated. Reading polar data in the range from 500 Hz to about 2 kHz requires careful averaging, due to random variations in
21、 the test signal itself. Figure 5 shows how this is done. A line has been drawn through the center of the jagged response on the right side of the plot. Note that no tolerance is used in reading the averaged data. It is possible to reduce these data variations with a slower pen speed, but this requi
22、res a slower device rotation rate, increasing the measurement time. Plots of directivity index and directivity factor can be arrived at by several methods. Integration over the entire sphere surrounding the device will give the most accurate value. The easiest way to do this is to make measure- ment
- 配套讲稿:
如PPT文件的首页显示word图标,表示该PPT已包含配套word讲稿。双击word图标可打开word文档。
- 特殊限制:
部分文档作品中含有的国旗、国徽等图片,仅作为作品整体效果示例展示,禁止商用。设计者仅对作品中独创性部分享有著作权。
- 关 键 词:
- JBL Technical Note Vol.1 No.17 电路原理图 Vol No 17 电路 原理图